Wednesday, May 18, 2005

Does anyone read Orenstein?

I sure hope so, because he continues to break it down with regards to the "nuclear option". This new article, a follow up to the one I posted yesterday delves further into the history of "up and down" voting on judicial nominees. Just as you might suspect, Republican assertions of the Senate's 214 years of unfilibustered up and down votes on nominees is basically crap.